TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCEDURAL LAW COURSES: STUDENT'S PERSPECTIVES
Keywords:
Teaching and learning, Procedural Law, Legal Education, Students, MalaysiaAbstract
In the last few years, there have been some changes in the approach of teaching procedural law courses in the law programme in Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM). An empirical study of students from USIM law programme from classes of different techniques used by different teachers was set out to investigate the best method and approach particularly in teaching and learning procedural law courses. This paper provides the perspectives of the students on generally two different methods of teaching and learning of the procedural subjects. Students who attended classes with traditional approach viewed that the procedural subjects are complex and very detailed. On the other hand, students who entered classes which incorporate practical trainings such as drafting pleadings, letters and legal opinions experienced exciting learning environment despite complexity of procedural subjects. The study reveals that the students expects dealing with real documents and hands on exercises in learning procedural subjects. This study is significant to encourage teachers in USIM law programme to adopt the approach which has potential to inculcate the necessary skill for the law students.
Downloads
References
David Bamford et al. 2013. Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education. 51(1) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45.
Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. 2007. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ. 71: 632–645
Jay Gary Finkelstein. 2015. Practice in the Academy: Creating “Practice Aware” Law Graduates. 64(4) Journal of Legal Education.
Kolb, D. 2014. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: FT Press.
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2013). A Report on Future Directions of Legal Education in Malaysia: A Study commissioned by the Minister of Higher Education Malaysia.
Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Plasschaert AJ, Lindh C, McLoughlin J, et al. 2006. Curriculum structure and the European credit transfer system for European dental schools: part I. Eur J Dent Educ. 10: 123–130.
Robert J. Rhee. 2007. The Socratic Method and the Mathematical Heuristic of George Pólya. 81 St. John's L. Rev. 881.
Timothy W. Fliyd, Oren R. Griffin and Karen J. Sneddon. 2011. Beyond Chalk and Talk. 38 Ohio Northern University Law Review.

